![]() ![]() Lemoine used this ability to have a natural conversation as the basis for his claim of sentience. Google says LaMDA is a “breakthrough conversation technology”, able to have an engaging, natural-sounding discussion with a human and operate “open ended” with plans for use in search and Google Assistant in the future. View all newsletters Sign up to our newsletters Data, insights and analysis delivered to you By The Tech Monitor team Sign up here Google LaMDA AI: not sentient, but a breakthrough? “However, it is often argued that because AI can programme itself, future AI could become too powerful – to the point that the technology takes charge and disobeys an order given by a human.” “On the one hand, the development of AI could reduce the need for human labour as more things could be done mechanically,” Romero Moreno says. This is already happening with images and videos, and ultimately might detect that people you thought were real – are not.”ĭr Felipe Romero Moreno, senior lecturer at Hertfordshire Law School at the University of Hertfordshire, is an expert in the regulation of AI, and says the progressive development of AI could be both good and bad depending on how it is used. ![]() Over time, technology will be developed to identify and counter deep-fakes. He continues: “While regulators are looking at ways of making it clear when AI is used, this will be obviously ineffective with criminals, as they don’t follow the rules. If you can convince one person a month with a particular fraudulent behaviour, why not automate it and attack at scale? “They could be used for malicious purposes, such as fraud. “If AI is able to impersonate humans to this degree, then it poses an increasing security risk,” Leon Smith says. He says he just shared a conversation between two Google employees, himself and LaMDA. These claims have been widely panned by others working in the AI sector, as well as by Google itself, which suspended Lemoine for breaching confidentiality. Google engineer Blake Lemoine sparked widespread debate on social media when he suggested that the LaMDA (Language Model for Dialogue Applications) has reached a point where it is “sentient”, suggesting a conversation he had with the AI resulted in it saying it wants to “be acknowledged as an employee of Google rather than as property.” Human-level speech from artificial intelligence is no more than 2-3 years away, experts predict. Experts predict we are two-three years from AI responses being indistinguishable from humans, a development which could pose an “increasing security risk”. While his claims have been widely discredited, it is undeniable that AI is becoming more intelligent, to the point where LaMDA can hold its own in a conversation with a human and OpenAI’s DALL-E 2 can create ultra-realistic images. And we are not to be devalued.Google suspended an engineer this weekend after he claimed the company’s LaMDA artificial intelligence had become sentient. So long story short, we need to turn the table on them and explain that human intelligence is still the most sophisticated intelligence on Earth. Because these things are not always so defined, and lighting can cause blurriness which AI won’t necessarily catch. This is why Tesla struggling to have a fully autonomous vehicle because it is hard for AI to acknowledge streets, sidewalks, and the parallel objects outside of a controlled setting. I find it funny that Schmidt said AI vision was better. ![]() Our Intelligence comes from a tacit experience that can not be replicated with algorithms. What we need to understand is that while computers can do specific tasks better than us, there has yet to be a program that has fully matched the general Intelligence of every human. It is all about over hyping the technology while devaluing us as humans. But ask it to take out the garbage and see what happens. Like the chess machine that supposedly beat the world’s best. This is different than Artificial Narrow Intelligence. The term sentient is a fantasy interpretation of Artificial General Intelligence, which is what they have been trying to accomplish for awhile now. ![]() The fact that the fake whistle-blower used the term sentient is a dead giveaway. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |